sriSPORTS REHAB
INTELLIGENCE
ES

DISCUSSION · METHODS · SOURCES

An integration that preserves context.

The question: which movement, training and injury-consequence dimensions are observed, and which data and validation are needed to connect them?

View conclusions and figures ↗Explore movement ↗Read the Spanish synthesis ↗

Three perspectives, three outcomes.

01 / Movement

RIC describes contemporaneous status metadata and biomechanics under a lab protocol. The pilot retains source scalars: local event/cycle validation remains pending.

02 / Training

Runners contribute histories before labels that prevented session completion. Control selection based on future fitness constrains interpretation even with temporal validation.

03 / Consequences

Football contributes absences and reported duration. Inclusive intervals, repetition and unverified identity prevent automatically converting records into clinical episodes or availability.

The atlas contribution.

The 104 definitions retain source, units, context, timing and limitations. Some are identity fields or retrospective outputs; they do not form a common predictor table. The outcome registry and nine-domain matrix document coverage and construct differences. There is no verified participant crosswalk across the three sources.

RIC injury history is not equivalent to football absence duration. The runners label does not supply a diagnosis or days lost. IOC surveillance principles help distinguish these concepts, but do not retrospectively validate source clinical accuracy.

How it can be verified.

Eleven aggregate or definition files are pinned to source-project commits with SHA-256. The compilation preserves original catalogue rows, avoids pooled athlete or injury counts and builds an offline release. Numerical results belong to the source analyses; the atlas does not retrain their models.

Full methods ↗Spanish discussion ↗English discussion ↗

Primary references and attribution.

Focused narrative review verified on 1 November 2026. It is not a systematic review or a claim of worldwide novelty. References inform the framework; numbers come from pinned project outputs.

Reference curve for the running animation: Fukuchi RK, Fukuchi CA, Duarte M (2017). A public dataset of running biomechanics and the effects of running speed on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics. PeerJ 5:e3298. Data on Figshare (doi 10.6084/m9.figshare.4543435, CC BY 4.0): 28 runners, 2.5 m/s, processed files with verified md5. Hip and knee match Table 4 of the article; the ankle in the files sits about 3.4° lower, so it is not compared with the RIC pilot.

Fukuchi and colleagues article (PeerJ) ↗ · Data on Figshare ↗

View literature verification record ↗

Original measurements belong to their creators, credited separately from Víctor Andrés Gómez López's analysis. Original software MIT; atlas compilation and derivatives CC BY-SA 4.0, with original source rights preserved. No full articles or third-party figures are republished.

Attribution, transformations and licences ↗